---
title: "The Best AEO Software for Agencies at Client Number Ten"
description: "At client number ten, the best AEO dashboard is the one your team barely needs to open."
url: "https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what"
image: "https://groas.com/media/blog/fedc021508a1b971f7a74aa56deeca5e02458d143880d1e1fdfb865634e7ad84.png"
published: "2026-10-05T05:41:18.004Z"
modified: "2026-10-05T05:41:18.908Z"
---

[Google Ads Best Practices](https://groas.com/category/google-ads-best-practices) · October 5, 2026 · 11 min read

# The Best AEO Software for Agencies at Client Number Ten

[DavidFounder & CEO @ groas](https://groas.com/author/david)

![Cover image for: The Best AEO Software for Agencies at Client Number Ten](https://groas.com/media/blog/fedc021508a1b971f7a74aa56deeca5e02458d143880d1e1fdfb865634e7ad84.png)

In this article

1. [The ten-client test](#the-ten-client-test)
2. [1. Autonomous execution platforms with flat per-domain pricing](#1-autonomous-execution-platforms-with-flat-per-domain-pricing)
3. [2. White-label trackers with fixed multi-brand tiers](#2-white-label-trackers-with-fixed-multi-brand-tiers)
4. [3. Dedicated prompt trackers metered by credit or prompt](#3-dedicated-prompt-trackers-metered-by-credit-or-prompt)
5. [4. Legacy SEO suites with an AI visibility add-on](#4-legacy-seo-suites-with-an-ai-visibility-add-on)

At client number ten, the best AEO dashboard is the one your team barely needs to open. **My pick for agencies selling AEO as a monthly retainer is an autonomous execution platform with flat per-domain pricing:** it takes on the fixes that prompt trackers and reporting suites leave on your desk.

I have seen this pricing trap before in PPC. A tool looks inexpensive when you test it on one account; then the bill climbs with every account you win, while your team still does the work. Per-prompt and per-workspace fees are the new percentage-of-spend fee. They grow with your agency’s success, not necessarily with the work the vendor takes off your hands.

An AEO client is not paying $2,500 a month for a PDF showing that their brand failed to appear in ChatGPT. They want to be cited, recommended, and surfaced when buyers ask generative engines what to purchase. That means someone has to handle prompt tracking, crawler diagnostics, answer-oriented content, third-party citations, and reporting. Buying software may cover one of those jobs. It rarely covers all five.

For an agency retainer to stay healthy, one useful benchmark is keeping third-party tooling below [15% to 20% of gross retainer revenue](https://rocketito.com/blog/white-label-seo-pricing). But a cheap subscription is no bargain if it leaves fifteen hours of manual fulfillment per client on the calendar. I ranked the four categories agencies buy by both costs: **the invoice and the work left over**.

## The ten-client test

Say you charge $2,000 a month across ten client domains. That is $20,000 in monthly gross retainer revenue, with a $3,000 to $4,000 tooling budget under that benchmark. Now add 12 to 18 hours of technical and content work per client. The software bill may fit while the delivery schedule does not. Your team is carrying 120 to 180 hours of work before it has dealt with client calls, approvals, or reporting.

That is why I would not rank these products by the number of charts on a demo screen. A client does not pay you to admire a share-of-voice graph. They pay you to improve what buyers see when they ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity about the category. **Track what changes, then ask who makes the change happen.**

![Diagram contrasting diagnostic AEO audits with an execution engine that ships fixes.](https://groas.com/media/blog/6fc1770e3a0233eaa3703ca54fa1261ed134477ace4d13358bdd19e7e4ad6669.png)

## 1. Autonomous execution platforms with flat per-domain pricing

- **Who it is for:** Growth agencies, performance shops, and SEO teams managing multiple client domains that want to sell AEO execution without building a separate bench for prompt research, technical fixes, content, and citation outreach.
- **What it does better:** It moves from diagnosis to remediation. An engine like [groas](https://groas.com/for-agencies) works on crawler issues, answer-optimized pages, and citations under agency branding, with a dedicated human strategist supervising the work.
- **What rules it out:** An advisory business built around selling research decks, audits, and consulting hours. Automation removes the labor such a firm bills for.

This category wins because the billing unit and the delivery model make sense together. A flat per-domain fee rises as you add domains, but it does not jump because an account manager decides to track more buyer questions or check another model. More important, your staff is not handed every finding as a new assignment. That is the distinction I care about: **software that identifies work is not the same as software that does it**.

It does not eliminate agency ownership. Someone still sets the direction, checks the outputs, manages approvals, and answers the client when the commercial priorities change. But that is a better use of a senior strategist than copying bot logs into a spreadsheet on Friday afternoon. Our breakdown of the [best AEO tools for agencies](https://groas.com/post/the-best-aeo-and-ai-search-visibility-to) explores the same divide between monitoring and execution.

**Buy this category when your retainer promises ongoing improvements, not just an explanation of what went wrong.**

## 2. White-label trackers with fixed multi-brand tiers

- **Who it is for:** Agencies with an established technical and content team that already writes briefs, updates pages, and pursues citations, but needs client-ready reporting.
- **What it does better:** Keeps the reporting software bill predictable. [Geoptie lists 10 brand workspaces for $99 a month](https://geoptie.com/blog/best-aeo-tools), with multi-engine tracking and white-label PDF exports.
- **What rules it out:** It does not fulfill the findings. Your team still has to diagnose and fix the problems the reports expose.

At ten clients, $99 a month is easy to like. Then the work arrives. Someone checks robots.txt and crawl behavior, investigates why a page is not being read as intended, drafts comparison content, and pursues third-party mentions. The tracker can show a gap. It cannot close one.

If that work takes fifteen to twenty hours per domain each month, you are scheduling 150 to 200 hours across ten clients. At a $100 hourly billing rate, those hours represent $1,500 to $2,000 of billable capacity per client. That is **opportunity cost, not a claim that every employee costs $100 an hour**. Either way, it matters on a $2,500 retainer. A low software invoice can hide a substantial fulfillment commitment.

There is nothing wrong with this model if you already have the team and sell its work at a price that supports it. Just do not mistake a fixed-price reporting tool for a fixed-price delivery operation. **Choose the tracker when execution is already staffed and paid for.**

## 3. Dedicated prompt trackers metered by credit or prompt

- **Who it is for:** Research consultancies and enterprise brand teams that need detailed monitoring across a smaller set of domains and can support the manual work that follows.
- **What it does better:** Gives teams granular prompt-level tracking and model-by-model views of answers.
- **What rules it out:** Usage pricing can climb as you add clients, prompts, or models. The platform still does not make the fixes for you.

Here is the arithmetic behind the concern. Peec AI defines a credit as one prompt across one model for one day. Its [Growth tier lists $495 a month for 25,000 credits across 10 client projects](https://peec.ai/pricing-agencies). Spread evenly, that allows about 2,500 credits per client, or roughly 27 daily prompts if each runs across three models over a 30-day month. Track 50 prompts across three models for ten clients and you reach 45,000 credits in that month, pointing you toward the [$795-a-month Scale tier](https://peec.ai/entity-map).

Otterly.ai uses tiers rather than that credit formula: [Lite at $29 a month for 15 prompts, Standard at $189 for 100, and Premium at $489 for 400](https://visible.seranking.com/blog/otterly-ai-review/), with extra 100-prompt blocks priced at $99 a month. Fifty prompts for each of ten clients means 500 prompts, or about $588 a month on those figures before model add-ons such as [Claude at $109 a month or Gemini at $59](https://centium.ai/compare/otterly). Profound AI’s [Agency Growth pricing lists a $99 monthly platform fee plus $399 per client workspace](https://arobis.ai/blog/profound-pricing). At ten workspaces, that is $4,089 a month for the platform.

Those products do not use identical billing units, so I would not treat the figures as a universal quote. The pattern is the point: **every new client can add monitoring cost before it adds any fulfillment capacity**. Then your team still has to investigate the answer, update the page, and pursue the citation. Buy granular tracking when that research is the deliverable and the client pays for the people behind it. Do not buy it expecting the dashboard to run an AEO retainer.

## 4. Legacy SEO suites with an AI visibility add-on

- **Who it is for:** SEO agencies already using Semrush or Ahrefs that want an AI visibility check alongside their existing keyword and backlink workflows.
- **What it does better:** Keeps another set of monitoring data in a login the team already uses.
- **What rules it out:** Base subscriptions, domain add-ons, prompt limits, and seats can stack up, while the actual AEO fixes remain your team’s job.

Semrush’s AI Visibility Toolkit is listed at [$99 a month per domain](https://www.dageno.ai/blog/semrush-ai-visibility-toolkit-review) on top of a paid subscription described at $139 to $199 a month. The add-on includes 25 custom tracked prompts per domain; tracking 75 requires another $60 a month, and additional seats are listed at $99 each. Ten domain add-ons alone come to $990 a month. That is before the base plan or extra prompts.

Ahrefs Brand Radar has a different structure. It requires an Ahrefs account, described from $129 a month, and lists AI visibility at [$199 a month for one engine index or $699 for all six](https://mentionsapi.com/blog/ahrefs-brand-radar), with custom prompt packs adding $50 a month. Those numbers do not translate into a single ten-client invoice without knowing the coverage each account needs. They do show why I would price the entire roster before buying an add-on for the first client.

A familiar interface saves friction. It does not turn mention charts into crawl fixes, new pages, or citations. **Choose the add-on for a temperature check, not as the fulfillment engine behind a full-service retainer.**

### The popular option I left out: DIY API scrapers

Agency founders sometimes ask why a Python script that polls OpenAI, Anthropic, and Perplexity APIs is not on this list. Direct prompts can look cheap per query. Maintaining a dependable client reporting system is another job entirely. Engine interfaces change, rate limits complicate collection, and citation layouts can change underneath a scraper. When that happens, someone has to fix the pipeline before the next report goes out.

Raw responses also leave you to build the competitive clustering, entity attribution, and technical diagnostics around them. If senior engineering time is already scarce, replacing a vendor invoice with a maintenance queue does not solve the agency problem. **I left DIY scraping out because the bill moves to your developers, not because the prompts cost too much.**

![Tablet showing a comparison of software costs, fulfillment work, and retainer risk across four AEO categories.](https://groas.com/media/blog/675f846cbeddc8a1de1c7eda1ccda7cc4792fc01206211a92f364121c9ee54fb.png)

### The four categories, on one page

| Category                   | Ten-domain software bill in this comparison                              | Work left with the agency                  | Main margin risk                             |
| -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------- |
| **Autonomous execution**   | Flat fee per domain                                                      | Strategy, oversight, and client management | The fee must fit the retainer                |
| **White-label tracker**    | $99 a month for the cited 10-workspace tier                              | Technical, content, and citation execution | Labor hidden behind a low subscription       |
| **Metered prompt tracker** | About $588 to $4,089 a month in the examples above                       | Investigation and remediation              | Usage or workspace fees grow with the roster |
| **SEO suite add-on**       | At least $990 for the cited Semrush domain add-ons, before the base plan | Investigation and remediation              | Layered subscriptions and limited prompts    |

The table is not a claim that every agency needs the same prompt coverage or that every vendor bundles the same work. It is a purchasing question: **after you pay the invoice, who is responsible for improving the client’s visibility?**

### What changes at five, ten, and fifteen domains

At five $2,000-a-month retainers, you have $10,000 in monthly gross revenue. A metered tracker bill of $400 to $600 can look manageable. But if manual fulfillment takes fifteen to twenty hours per client, you have already committed 75 to 100 hours a month. A founder can absorb that for a while. I would not build a service model around the founder continuing to do it after hours.

At ten domains, gross revenue reaches $20,000 and that same workload reaches 150 to 200 hours. One person’s calendar is now the constraint, even if the reporting subscription is cheap. A per-prompt or per-workspace platform can add a much larger software invoice on top. The agency is paying twice: once to see the problem, then again in staff time to address it.

At fifteen domains, gross revenue reaches $30,000. Manual fulfillment at the same rate means 225 to 300 hours each month. You need more delivery capacity or a different delivery model. Flat per-domain execution does not make the strategist’s job disappear, and I would not promise that it eliminates hiring forever. It does keep prompt volume from dictating the bill while taking routine remediation off the team’s queue. **Scale the work deliberately; do not assume the tenth client will fit into the hours left over from the fifth.**

![Graphic comparing agency workload and software-billing pressure at 5, 10, and 15 client domains.](https://groas.com/media/blog/6761a7ce79d96784a18d5c4ae30c3430e9c29da828abac42dbad1573b0cdcc68.png)

### Who should skip autonomous execution

My pick has a clear audience, which means it has clear exclusions:

1. **Pure advisory firms:** If clients pay you for diagnostic decks, research, and committee meetings, automating remediation takes away work you currently sell. A tracker may fit that deliverable better.
2. **Traditional corporate PR agencies:** If your service centers on placing executive quotes in print or negotiating syndication through relationships, prompt-sentiment reporting may be more relevant than technical AEO execution.
3. **Agencies with locked client infrastructure:** If you cannot change a client’s CMS, schemas, or server headers, an execution platform cannot do much of the technical work you would be buying it to do.

Check those constraints before signing a vendor contract. Our guide to [AEO for agencies](https://groas.com/post/aeo-for-agencies-the-questions-i-keep-ge) lays out the operational questions to settle before your client agreements promise work your setup cannot deliver.

### The pick for the reader who skipped to the end

**If you sell ongoing AEO improvements across a growing client roster, buy autonomous execution with flat per-domain pricing.** White-label trackers make reporting cheap but leave the fixes with your staff. Metered prompt trackers make research detailed but let the invoice grow with your coverage. Legacy SEO add-ons keep monitoring familiar without taking delivery off the calendar.

AEO needs a continuous loop: notice when answers change, make pages accessible and useful to answer engines, and build the mentions that support visibility. That loop cannot wait for the monthly report to become somebody’s task list. An engine like [groas](https://groas.com/) handles the recurring execution under your agency brand while your people own direction, accountability, and the client relationship. At client number ten, that is the division of labor I would want to sell.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### What kind of AEO software is best for an agency running ten client domains?

An autonomous execution platform with flat per-domain pricing. A flat per-domain fee grows as you add domains but does not jump when you track more prompts or models, and the software takes on fixes like crawler issues, answer-optimized pages, and citations instead of leaving every finding as a new task for your staff.

### Why do per-prompt AEO tool prices become a problem for agencies?

Per-prompt and per-workspace fees grow with your agency's success rather than with the work the vendor takes off your hands. The article compares them to the percentage-of-spend trap in PPC, where a tool looks cheap on one account but the bill climbs with every new client while your team still does the fulfillment work.

### What work does an AEO retainer actually involve?

Five jobs: prompt tracking, crawler diagnostics, answer-oriented content, third-party citations, and reporting. Buying software may cover one of those jobs, but it rarely covers all five, which is why the remaining work matters as much as the software bill.

### How much of retainer revenue should an agency spend on AEO tooling?

One useful benchmark is keeping third-party tooling below 15 to 20 percent of gross retainer revenue. On ten $2,000-a-month clients, that is $20,000 in gross revenue with a $3,000 to $4,000 tooling budget. A cheap subscription is still no bargain if it leaves many hours of manual fulfillment on the calendar.

### When should an agency choose a white-label AEO tracker instead of an execution platform?

Choose a white-label tracker when your agency already has a technical and content team that writes briefs, updates pages, and pursues citations, and you only need client-ready reporting. Geoptie lists 10 brand workspaces for $99 a month, but the tracker can only show a gap; your team still has to close it.

### How expensive do metered prompt trackers get for a ten-client agency?

The examples in the comparison range from roughly $588 a month for Otterly.ai at 500 prompts to $4,089 a month for Profound AI with ten workspaces. Peec AI's Growth tier lists $495 for 25,000 credits, which 50 prompts across three models for ten clients would exceed. Usage pricing climbs as you add clients, and the platform still does not make the fixes.

### Are Semrush or Ahrefs AI visibility add-ons enough for a full-service AEO retainer?

No. Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit lists at $99 a month per domain on top of a base subscription, and ten domain add-ons alone come to $990 a month before extra prompts or seats. Ahrefs Brand Radar lists $199 to $699 a month. These add-ons keep monitoring data in a familiar login but do not turn mention charts into crawl fixes, new pages, or citations.

### How does agency workload change between five, ten, and fifteen AEO clients?

At five $2,000-a-month retainers, fifteen to twenty hours of fulfillment per client means 75 to 100 hours a month, which a founder can absorb for a while. At ten domains that reaches 150 to 200 hours, and at fifteen it reaches 225 to 300 hours a month. At that point you need more delivery capacity or a different delivery model.

## Related Posts

- [![A paper price tag trapped inside a wooden puzzle box with only its red string poking out, like a page answer hidden behind a widget.](https://groas.com/media/blog/fc591013b9fbca0a4fbbd5b5da9840f87092e2e1974af7c54a3f3b23280ab402.png)](https://groas.com/post/the-landing-page-pre-flight-checklist-fo)
  ### [The AI Overview Landing Page Checklist PPC Operators Already Know](https://groas.com/post/the-landing-page-pre-flight-checklist-fo)
  [October 6, 2026 • 9 min read](https://groas.com/post/the-landing-page-pre-flight-checklist-fo)

  [Written by Alexander Perelman](https://groas.com/post/the-landing-page-pre-flight-checklist-fo)
- [![At night a man feeds coins into a meter to keep a flickering neon arrow lit, while the shop next door's name is carved in stone and glows for free.](https://groas.com/media/blog/ad30079702ecc11a3bff7edb537edcca030726c0ed2abe36967400042b81b547.png)](https://groas.com/post/pay-for-the-ad-in-the-ai-overview-or-ear)
  ### [AI Overview Ads or Citations? The Case for Each, and My Verdict](https://groas.com/post/pay-for-the-ad-in-the-ai-overview-or-ear)
  [October 6, 2026 • 11 min read](https://groas.com/post/pay-for-the-ad-in-the-ai-overview-or-ear)

  [Written by David](https://groas.com/post/pay-for-the-ad-in-the-ai-overview-or-ear)
- [![Clay figure at 1am stands under twelve blaring smoke alarms holding a mop, tickets piling at his feet: alerts are cheap, the fixing is the real work.](https://groas.com/media/blog/7dc21b6208fddea75f45ab3140778709349a82c720e56c41e17f0a244bae350c.png)](https://groas.com/post/stop-shopping-for-aeo-software-at-10-cli)
  ### [Stop Shopping for AEO Trackers. At 10 Client Domains, Execution Wins](https://groas.com/post/stop-shopping-for-aeo-software-at-10-cli)
  [October 6, 2026 • 9 min read](https://groas.com/post/stop-shopping-for-aeo-software-at-10-cli)

  [Written by David](https://groas.com/post/stop-shopping-for-aeo-software-at-10-cli)

## The Machines Already Run Search, You Should Probably Own One

[get started free](https://groas.typeform.com/to/xC1bQNUT)

## Structured data

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas","name":"groas","url":"https://groas.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://groas.com/icon-512.png","width":512,"height":512},"sameAs":["https://www.linkedin.com/company/groas/"]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://groas.com/#website","name":"groas","url":"https://groas.com/","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what#webpage","url":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what","name":"The Best AEO Software for Agencies at Client Number Ten","description":"At client number ten, the best AEO dashboard is the one your team barely needs to open.","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://groas.com/#website"},"about":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://groas.com/media/blog/fedc021508a1b971f7a74aa56deeca5e02458d143880d1e1fdfb865634e7ad84.png"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what#breadcrumb"},"dateModified":"2026-10-05T05:41:18.908Z","mainEntity":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what#article"}},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://groas.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://groas.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Google Ads Best Practices","item":"https://groas.com/category/google-ads-best-practices"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"The Best AEO Software for Agencies at Client Number Ten","item":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what"}]},{"@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what#article","url":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://groas.com/blog#blog"},"headline":"The Best AEO Software for Agencies at Client Number Ten","description":"At client number ten, the best AEO dashboard is the one your team barely needs to open. My pick for agencies selling AEO as a monthly retainer is an autonomous execution platform with flat per-domain pricing: it takes on the fixes that p…","datePublished":"2026-10-05T05:41:18.004Z","dateModified":"2026-10-05T05:41:18.908Z","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://groas.com/media/blog/fedc021508a1b971f7a74aa56deeca5e02458d143880d1e1fdfb865634e7ad84.png"},"author":{"@id":"https://groas.com/author/david#person"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"},"articleSection":"Google Ads Best Practices","keywords":"Google Ads, Google Ads Best Practices","wordCount":2255,"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://groas.com/author/david#person","name":"David","jobTitle":"Founder & CEO @ groas","image":"https://groas.com/media/blog/363be9ad5255816654dac065d01bf1c6063110b400bb38cc199570267232027c.jpg","worksFor":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"}},{"@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://groas.com/post/aeo-software-for-agencies-ranked-by-what#faq","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What kind of AEO software is best for an agency running ten client domains?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"An autonomous execution platform with flat per-domain pricing. A flat per-domain fee grows as you add domains but does not jump when you track more prompts or models, and the software takes on fixes like crawler issues, answer-optimized pages, and citations instead of leaving every finding as a new task for your staff."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why do per-prompt AEO tool prices become a problem for agencies?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Per-prompt and per-workspace fees grow with your agency's success rather than with the work the vendor takes off your hands. The article compares them to the percentage-of-spend trap in PPC, where a tool looks cheap on one account but the bill climbs with every new client while your team still does the fulfillment work."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What work does an AEO retainer actually involve?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Five jobs: prompt tracking, crawler diagnostics, answer-oriented content, third-party citations, and reporting. Buying software may cover one of those jobs, but it rarely covers all five, which is why the remaining work matters as much as the software bill."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How much of retainer revenue should an agency spend on AEO tooling?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"One useful benchmark is keeping third-party tooling below 15 to 20 percent of gross retainer revenue. On ten $2,000-a-month clients, that is $20,000 in gross revenue with a $3,000 to $4,000 tooling budget. A cheap subscription is still no bargain if it leaves many hours of manual fulfillment on the calendar."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"When should an agency choose a white-label AEO tracker instead of an execution platform?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Choose a white-label tracker when your agency already has a technical and content team that writes briefs, updates pages, and pursues citations, and you only need client-ready reporting. Geoptie lists 10 brand workspaces for $99 a month, but the tracker can only show a gap; your team still has to close it."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How expensive do metered prompt trackers get for a ten-client agency?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The examples in the comparison range from roughly $588 a month for Otterly.ai at 500 prompts to $4,089 a month for Profound AI with ten workspaces. Peec AI's Growth tier lists $495 for 25,000 credits, which 50 prompts across three models for ten clients would exceed. Usage pricing climbs as you add clients, and the platform still does not make the fixes."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Are Semrush or Ahrefs AI visibility add-ons enough for a full-service AEO retainer?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No. Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit lists at $99 a month per domain on top of a base subscription, and ten domain add-ons alone come to $990 a month before extra prompts or seats. Ahrefs Brand Radar lists $199 to $699 a month. These add-ons keep monitoring data in a familiar login but do not turn mention charts into crawl fixes, new pages, or citations."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How does agency workload change between five, ten, and fifteen AEO clients?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"At five $2,000-a-month retainers, fifteen to twenty hours of fulfillment per client means 75 to 100 hours a month, which a founder can absorb for a while. At ten domains that reaches 150 to 200 hours, and at fifteen it reaches 225 to 300 hours a month. At that point you need more delivery capacity or a different delivery model."}}]}]}
```