---
title: "What AI Search Visibility Costs: The Tool, the Work, and the Bill You Miss"
description: "A $29 tracker can become an expensive way to watch a competitor get recommended."
url: "https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs"
image: "https://groas.com/media/blog/1048333432d1c5ab024f18d17455c31eac60632bbc0cf7678548a03b421931fd.png"
published: "2026-10-05T05:27:40.825Z"
modified: "2026-10-05T05:27:41.291Z"
---

[AI For Google Ads](https://groas.com/category/ai-for-google-ads) · October 5, 2026 · 10 min read

# What AI Search Visibility Costs: The Tool, the Work, and the Bill You Miss

[DavidFounder & CEO @ groas](https://groas.com/author/david)

![Cover image for: What AI Search Visibility Costs: The Tool, the Work, and the Bill You Miss](https://groas.com/media/blog/1048333432d1c5ab024f18d17455c31eac60632bbc0cf7678548a03b421931fd.png)

In this article

1. [First, fix the job you’re pricing](#first-fix-the-job-youre-pricing)
2. [In-house: the spreadsheet is cheap; the hours aren’t](#in-house-the-spreadsheet-is-cheap-the-hours-arent)
3. [Monitoring software: one small invoice, several large ones](#monitoring-software-one-small-invoice-several-large-ones)
4. [Done-for-you: pay for shipped work, not a nicer audit](#done-for-you-pay-for-shipped-work-not-a-nicer-audit)
5. [Put the 12-month bills beside the omissions](#put-the-12-month-bills-beside-the-omissions)
6. [The hidden cost is the month when nothing changes](#the-hidden-cost-is-the-month-when-nothing-changes)
7. [Buy the route that has an owner for the work](#buy-the-route-that-has-an-owner-for-the-work)

A $29 tracker can become an expensive way to watch a competitor get recommended. For the 60 buyer questions I’m pricing here, the recurring bill runs **$36,600 to $102,000 a year in-house, $23,268 to $91,188 with monitoring software and people to act on it, or $30,000 to $90,000 for done-for-you work**. Those routes do not buy identical amounts of labor. That is precisely why the sticker price is the wrong number to compare.

I used to tell clients to buy the tool and assign it to someone internally. I was wrong about how often _assign it to someone_ turned into pages published, technical fixes shipped and citations earned. The subscription is easy to approve. The work behind it is the bill.

| Route                                                        | Recurring annual cost | One-time cost                                         | Basis for the figure                                                                                                                                    |
| ------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| In-house: manual checks, two pages and four links monthly    | **$36,600–$102,000**  | No setup allowance in this model                      | Monthly labor at [$100/hour](https://groas.com/), [page rates](https://nathanojaokomo.com/) and [link rates](https://outreachrush.com/), detailed below |
| Monitoring software plus content, authority and staff to act | **$23,268–$91,188**   | **$500–$2,000** illustrative setup allowance          | Monthly tool and work estimates detailed below; published [prompt-tier examples](https://amicited.com/) show why the tool price varies                  |
| Done-for-you execution                                       | **$30,000–$90,000**   | **$0 where the vendor confirms no onboarding charge** | Illustrative $2,500–$7,500 monthly scope, within published [retainer benchmarks](https://thedigitalelevator.com/); verify the proposal                  |

These are **three ways to staff an illustrative job, not three quotes for identical deliverables**. The monitoring route, for example, budgets less staff time for checking because the tool does that part. It still needs someone to make changes. Here is what sits behind each total, including the costs a vendor’s pricing page would rather leave to your imagination.

## First, fix the job you’re pricing

Say you run a 30-person services business with one domain in one country. You want to know whether your name appears when buyers ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Google’s AI Overviews whom to hire. I’m pricing **60 buyer prompts checked weekly across those four surfaces**: service questions, competitor comparisons, best-of questions and brand questions. The work target is two new or revised pages and four to six new citing sources a month, plus one hour of reporting that somebody actually reads.

For labor, I use **$100 an hour**, the rate [groas uses to illustrate how human hours consume budget](https://groas.com/). That is an illustrative value for time, not a claim that every employee or contractor bills exactly that amount. Where a vendor’s price depends on scope, I’ll name the driver rather than manufacture a quote.

Prompt count matters before anyone touches a page. [Otterly Lite lists $29 a month for 15 daily prompts](https://rankshift.ai/). [AIClicks lists $59 for 30 tracked prompts across three models and $189 for 150 prompts on Pro](https://cloutly.com/). [Peec AI is listed at about €89 for 25 prompts and €199 for 100](https://amicited.com/). Those prices are not interchangeable: a prompt, an engine and a checking frequency can each change what a plan covers. For this business, a 15- or 30-prompt entry plan does not cover the stated list. Add another location, language or buyer persona, and check the cap again. The dashboard may still look the same while the invoice changes.

## In-house: the spreadsheet is cheap; the hours aren’t

Start without a paid tracker. Someone checks 60 prompts across four surfaces each week, records what appears and compares the results with last week. Allow **four to six hours weekly**, or roughly 16 to 24 hours a month, for $1,600 to $2,400 in valued time. A much narrower routine can be leaner: [groas describes a one-person, three-hour-a-week approach with under $100 a month in tools](https://groas.com/post/one-person-three-hours-a-week-under-100). But three hours still have a labor cost, and that narrower routine is not the four-surface job I’m pricing here.

Then comes the part that can change what buyers see. Two pages a month cost **$750 to $3,000** at the [freelancer and subject-specialist rates used in this example](https://nathanojaokomo.com/). Four links at $150 to $750 each add **$600 to $3,000**; the [published link-pricing examples](https://outreachrush.com/) also show why outreach is not a free side task. Technical work, such as schema, internal links and bot access, still needs someone to do it. I have not slipped an invented developer rate into the total.

| In-house recurring line      | Monthly calculation            | Monthly cost            | Figure source                                                         |
| ---------------------------- | ------------------------------ | ----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Manual prompt checks         | 16–24 hours × $100             | $1,600–$2,400           | Illustrative weekly workload; [$100 hourly basis](https://groas.com/) |
| Two pages                    | Freelancer-to-specialist rates | $750–$3,000             | [Published writing rates](https://nathanojaokomo.com/)                |
| Four links                   | 4 × $150–$750                  | $600–$3,000             | [Published link-rate examples](https://outreachrush.com/)             |
| Reporting someone reads      | 1 hour × $100                  | $100                    | Illustrative scope; [$100 hourly basis](https://groas.com/)           |
| **In-house recurring total** | **12 × $3,050–$8,500**         | **$3,050–$8,500/month** | Sum of the lines above; **$36,600–$102,000/year**                     |

You can make the cash bill look smaller by removing links or using employee time you already pay for. You have not made the job disappear. If nobody owns the technical fixes or authority work, **price that omission as missing execution**, not as an in-house discount.

## Monitoring software: one small invoice, several large ones

A tracker replaces much of the checking routine. It does not replace the writer, developer or person responsible for getting mentioned elsewhere. That distinction is easy to lose when the subscription is the only price on the product page.

The entry tiers are attractive for a reason. [Profound Starter is listed at $99 a month for ChatGPT-only tracking; Semrush One at $199 with AI Visibility included; and Ahrefs Brand Radar at $199 as an add-on](https://demandsage.com/). [Scrunch Core is listed at $250 a month for 125 to 350 prompts across four to seven engines](https://amicited.com/). For the stated 60-prompt, four-surface job, I’m allowing **$189 to $499 a month** for a suitable tier or additional capacity, not claiming that every named product offers the same coverage at that price. Confirm engines, frequency and prompt definitions before comparing plans. [Peec’s listed price for 25 prompts moved from €75 to about €89](https://techcrunch.com/); even a published starting price is worth checking again before you buy.

Now put the work back on the bill. The software route below allows two pages and four links, as in the in-house route, but budgets **four to eight staff hours monthly** to read results, assign work and check that it happened. It does not include the in-house route’s manual checking hours. That is why its low-end annual total can sit below the in-house total without suggesting that a dashboard writes pages for free.

| Software-route recurring line                  | Monthly calculation                          | Monthly cost            | Figure source                                                                                                                           |
| ---------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Tracker for the stated prompt and engine scope | Illustrative suitable tier or added capacity | $189–$499               | Range used for this comparison; compare [published prompt tiers](https://amicited.com/) and [product listings](https://demandsage.com/) |
| Extra domain, seat or country                  | Allowance if needed                          | $0–$300                 | Illustrative allowance; confirm the vendor’s caps and quote                                                                             |
| Two pages and four links                       | Same work budget as in-house                 | $1,350–$6,000           | [Writing rates](https://nathanojaokomo.com/) and [link rates](https://outreachrush.com/)                                                |
| Staff time to read and assign work             | 4–8 hours × $100                             | $400–$800               | Illustrative scope; [$100 hourly basis](https://groas.com/)                                                                             |
| **Software-route recurring total**             | **12 × $1,939–$7,599**                       | **$1,939–$7,599/month** | Sum of the lines above; **$23,268–$91,188/year**                                                                                        |

Keep the **$500 to $2,000 illustrative setup allowance** separate from that recurring total. The amount depends on what needs setting up and what a vendor includes; it is a planning allowance, not a quoted fee. Likewise, an extra seat or country may cost nothing on your plan or force a change of tier. Ask before the second location goes live.

The more important question is not whether the dashboard can show that a competitor appears on 14 questions. It is who will do something with that finding. [Those are the questions to ask before buying another dashboard](https://groas.com/post/aeo-for-agencies-the-questions-i-keep-ge). If the answer is nobody, the cheapest plan is not a bargain. It is a neatly formatted waiting room.

## Done-for-you: pay for shipped work, not a nicer audit

A done-for-you fee should cover tracking **and** the changes it prompts. Published prices cover a wide spread: [global GEO agency listings run from $1,500 to $25,000 a month](https://upgrowth.in/), while a [mid-market benchmark puts many programs at $2,000 to $8,000 monthly](https://thedigitalelevator.com/). One vendor with public prices, [Arobis, lists Foundation at $2,500 and Growth at $5,000 a month, both including implementation](https://arobis.ai/). A range this wide tells you to read the scope, not average the prices.

![Illustrated invoice with a small tracking charge beside much larger labor and delay costs](https://groas.com/media/blog/932a39958f08e44ad11a8e1eec6cfcb9aba74a7f89c93487fbc7fa5120de6a7b.png)

For this comparison, I use **$2,500 to $7,500 a month, or $30,000 to $90,000 over 12 months**. The scope to request in writing is tracking across the surfaces you need, two pages built or rewritten, technical fixes, four to six new citations or mentions, and a report connected to the business outcome you care about. That is the difference between paying for execution and renting an audit. It is also the direction [groas takes with earned search](https://groas.com/earned-search): tracking buyer questions and citations, creating content, fixing technical gaps and pursuing trusted citations under a senior strategist’s direction.

Do not assume every retainer includes those deliverables, or that **$0 onboarding** is universal. The one-time figure in the overview applies only where the vendor confirms it. Ask what ships each month, who makes the changes and whether setup is a separate charge. A proposal that will not answer those questions has not priced the job; it has priced your willingness to stop asking.

## Put the 12-month bills beside the omissions

There is a leaner DIY path than the full in-house column: roughly three hours a week of checks and two pages at the low-end writing allowance come to about **$1,950 a month, or $23,400 a year**, using 12 hours a month at $100 an hour plus $750 for pages. It excludes links. It also does not perform the 60-prompt, four-surface checking routine costed above. Calling it the cheapest version of the _same_ program would hide both omissions.

For the stated job, the recurring comparison remains **$36,600–$102,000 in-house, $23,268–$91,188 with software and execution budget, and $30,000–$90,000 done-for-you**. Add the software route’s illustrative $500–$2,000 setup allowance only when comparing first-year totals, and add any separately quoted onboarding to a retainer. None of these ranges guarantees a result. They tell you what has been budgeted to try to produce one.

The ranges overlap because the drivers overlap: page complexity, specialist rates, link costs, staff hours, prompt caps and the scope a vendor agrees to ship. A monitoring plan can cost less than a retainer when you already have a writer and technical capacity ready to act. It can cost far more than its sticker price when you have to buy that capacity after the dashboard identifies the work. **Compare the completed job, not the first invoice.**

## The hidden cost is the month when nothing changes

Delay has no tidy subscription line. Three months of a $59 tracker is **$177 in software fees**. If nobody uses its findings to publish, fix or earn a mention, those three months bought observation, not execution. I cannot put a defensible revenue number on that delay for this illustrative business. I can tell you not to mistake a low cash outlay for progress.

The other hidden charges are mundane. Prompt caps can push you into a higher tier when the question list grows. A second domain, seat or country may change the plan. The person who owns a manual spreadsheet can leave, taking the routine with them. And an unread hour of reporting at the stated $100 hourly value costs **$1,200 a year** without changing a page. None is glamorous enough for a pricing-page hero section. All belong in the budget conversation.

## Buy the route that has an owner for the work

**Pick DIY** when the prompt list is small, one person will keep the routine running and your team can publish and pursue citations without adding a contractor for every task. Skip the full in-house version if its authority or technical line exists only in a spreadsheet cell.

**Pick software** when you need repeatable monitoring and already have the writer, technical capacity and decision-maker to act on it. Check the engines, prompts, frequency, countries and seats before paying. Skip it when nobody has time assigned to the findings; a tracker cannot take that meeting for you.

**Pick done-for-you** when you need tracking, content, fixes and citations shipped together, and you would otherwise assemble and manage those hours yourself. Skip any retainer that sells an audit but will not state the monthly deliverables. A flat fee is useful only if the work inside it is real.

The cheapest mistake is paying **$29 to $99 a month** for a tracker you never act on. The most expensive is making the same mistake at scale: budgeting for software, staff and reports across a year while pages, fixes and citations remain undone. Price the labor. Price the caps. Then pay for the route that has someone responsible for changing the answer.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How much does AI search visibility cost per year for a small services business?

For an illustrative 30-person services business tracking 60 buyer prompts across four AI surfaces, the article prices three routes: $36,600 to $102,000 a year in-house, $23,268 to $91,188 with monitoring software plus staff to act on it, and $30,000 to $90,000 for done-for-you execution. The routes do not buy identical amounts of labor, which is why the sticker price alone is the wrong number to compare.

### What goes into the in-house cost of tracking AI search visibility?

The in-house route costs $3,050 to $8,500 a month. Manual checks of 60 prompts weekly take 16 to 24 hours at $100 an hour, two pages cost $750 to $3,000, four links at $150 to $750 each add $600 to $3,000, and an hour of reporting costs $100. Removing links or using existing employee time shrinks the cash bill but does not make the work disappear.

### Does an AI visibility tracker replace the actual work of improving rankings?

No. A tracker replaces much of the manual checking routine, but it does not replace the writer, developer or person responsible for earning citations and shipping fixes. If nobody is assigned to act on the findings, the subscription buys observation rather than execution.

### Why do AI visibility tool prices vary so much between plans?

Prices vary because a prompt, an engine and a checking frequency each change what a plan covers. For example, entry tiers list $29 a month for 15 daily prompts or $59 for 30 tracked prompts, while a 60-prompt, four-surface job may need a $189 to $499 monthly tier. Prompt caps, extra domains, seats or countries can also force a higher tier, so confirm scope before comparing.

### What should a done-for-you AI search retainer include?

A done-for-you fee should cover tracking across the surfaces you need, two pages built or rewritten, technical fixes, four to six new citations or mentions, and a report tied to a business outcome. The article prices this scope at $2,500 to $7,500 monthly, but retainer benchmarks range from $1,500 to $25,000 a month. Ask what ships each month, who makes the changes and whether onboarding is a separate charge.

### Is there a cheaper DIY option for AI search visibility?

Yes, a leaner DIY path costs about $1,950 a month, or $23,400 a year, using roughly three hours a week of checks plus two low-end pages. It excludes links and does not perform the full 60-prompt, four-surface checking routine, so calling it the cheapest version of the same program would hide those omissions.

### What hidden costs should I budget for with AI search monitoring?

Hidden costs include the delay cost of months where nothing changes, prompt caps pushing you into a higher tier, extra charges for a second domain, seat or country, the risk of a spreadsheet owner leaving with the routine, and unread reporting that costs $1,200 a year at a $100 hourly value without changing a page. Three months of a $59 tracker is $177 in fees that bought observation, not execution, if nobody acts on it.

## Related Posts

- [![Clay figure pours a wheelbarrow of articles into a wall funnel whose pipe is disconnected, so the pages pile on the floor beside an unused wrench.](https://groas.com/media/blog/e1a99963f159a4756e614472ee73400643c5900fa7bde718abe8fa563e8cdc77.png)](https://groas.com/post/can-chatgpt-even-read-your-site-a-45-min)
  ### [Can ChatGPT Read Your Site? A 45-Minute Check Before You Write More AEO Content](https://groas.com/post/can-chatgpt-even-read-your-site-a-45-min)
  [October 6, 2026 • 10 min read](https://groas.com/post/can-chatgpt-even-read-your-site-a-45-min)

  [Written by Alexander Perelman](https://groas.com/post/can-chatgpt-even-read-your-site-a-45-min)
- [![Cartoon of a marketer noting 'position two' after one pull of a slot machine whose reels are already spinning to a new result.](https://groas.com/media/blog/038bfefb4237637a1718ff66b379d5bdc42d57615f25797529aa5ef5682a4f7e.png)](https://groas.com/post/i-measured-ai-visibility-like-a-ppc-acco)
  ### [Six PPC Habits That Misread AI Visibility](https://groas.com/post/i-measured-ai-visibility-like-a-ppc-acco)
  [October 6, 2026 • 10 min read](https://groas.com/post/i-measured-ai-visibility-like-a-ppc-acco)

  [Written by David](https://groas.com/post/i-measured-ai-visibility-like-a-ppc-acco)
- [![A tiny worker on a ladder fixes up five model shopfronts while a giant dusty 'take a number' dispenser looms behind, its ticket queue ignored.](https://groas.com/media/blog/35c8ce6c06242ab08178711c5abe08dda0df51ec927a2dd6bc9770aa5f83bdbf.png)](https://groas.com/post/one-strategist-zero-developers-five-clie)
  ### [One Strategist, Zero Developers, Five Domains: A 30-Day AEO Launch Playbook](https://groas.com/post/one-strategist-zero-developers-five-clie)
  [October 6, 2026 • 10 min read](https://groas.com/post/one-strategist-zero-developers-five-clie)

  [Written by David](https://groas.com/post/one-strategist-zero-developers-five-clie)

## The Machines Already Run Search, You Should Probably Own One

[get started free](https://groas.typeform.com/to/xC1bQNUT)

## Structured data

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas","name":"groas","url":"https://groas.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://groas.com/icon-512.png","width":512,"height":512},"sameAs":["https://www.linkedin.com/company/groas/"]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://groas.com/#website","name":"groas","url":"https://groas.com/","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs#webpage","url":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs","name":"What AI Search Visibility Costs: The Tool, the Work, and the Bill You Miss","description":"A $29 tracker can become an expensive way to watch a competitor get recommended.","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://groas.com/#website"},"about":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://groas.com/media/blog/1048333432d1c5ab024f18d17455c31eac60632bbc0cf7678548a03b421931fd.png"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs#breadcrumb"},"dateModified":"2026-10-05T05:27:41.291Z","mainEntity":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs#article"}},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://groas.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://groas.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"AI For Google Ads","item":"https://groas.com/category/ai-for-google-ads"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"What AI Search Visibility Costs: The Tool, the Work, and the Bill You Miss","item":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs"}]},{"@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs#article","url":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://groas.com/blog#blog"},"headline":"What AI Search Visibility Costs: The Tool, the Work, and the Bill You Miss","description":"A $29 tracker can become an expensive way to watch a competitor get recommended. For the 60 buyer questions I’m pricing here, the recurring bill runs $36,600 to $102,000 a year in-house, $23,268 to $91,188 with monitoring software and pe…","datePublished":"2026-10-05T05:27:40.825Z","dateModified":"2026-10-05T05:27:41.291Z","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://groas.com/media/blog/1048333432d1c5ab024f18d17455c31eac60632bbc0cf7678548a03b421931fd.png"},"author":{"@id":"https://groas.com/author/david#person"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"},"articleSection":"AI For Google Ads","keywords":"Google Ads, AI For Google Ads","wordCount":2113,"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://groas.com/author/david#person","name":"David","jobTitle":"Founder & CEO @ groas","image":"https://groas.com/media/blog/363be9ad5255816654dac065d01bf1c6063110b400bb38cc199570267232027c.jpg","worksFor":{"@id":"https://graph.groas.com/entity/groas"}},{"@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://groas.com/post/what-ai-search-visibility-actually-costs#faq","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"How much does AI search visibility cost per year for a small services business?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"For an illustrative 30-person services business tracking 60 buyer prompts across four AI surfaces, the article prices three routes: $36,600 to $102,000 a year in-house, $23,268 to $91,188 with monitoring software plus staff to act on it, and $30,000 to $90,000 for done-for-you execution. The routes do not buy identical amounts of labor, which is why the sticker price alone is the wrong number to compare."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What goes into the in-house cost of tracking AI search visibility?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The in-house route costs $3,050 to $8,500 a month. Manual checks of 60 prompts weekly take 16 to 24 hours at $100 an hour, two pages cost $750 to $3,000, four links at $150 to $750 each add $600 to $3,000, and an hour of reporting costs $100. Removing links or using existing employee time shrinks the cash bill but does not make the work disappear."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Does an AI visibility tracker replace the actual work of improving rankings?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No. A tracker replaces much of the manual checking routine, but it does not replace the writer, developer or person responsible for earning citations and shipping fixes. If nobody is assigned to act on the findings, the subscription buys observation rather than execution."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why do AI visibility tool prices vary so much between plans?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Prices vary because a prompt, an engine and a checking frequency each change what a plan covers. For example, entry tiers list $29 a month for 15 daily prompts or $59 for 30 tracked prompts, while a 60-prompt, four-surface job may need a $189 to $499 monthly tier. Prompt caps, extra domains, seats or countries can also force a higher tier, so confirm scope before comparing."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What should a done-for-you AI search retainer include?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"A done-for-you fee should cover tracking across the surfaces you need, two pages built or rewritten, technical fixes, four to six new citations or mentions, and a report tied to a business outcome. The article prices this scope at $2,500 to $7,500 monthly, but retainer benchmarks range from $1,500 to $25,000 a month. Ask what ships each month, who makes the changes and whether onboarding is a separate charge."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is there a cheaper DIY option for AI search visibility?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes, a leaner DIY path costs about $1,950 a month, or $23,400 a year, using roughly three hours a week of checks plus two low-end pages. It excludes links and does not perform the full 60-prompt, four-surface checking routine, so calling it the cheapest version of the same program would hide those omissions."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What hidden costs should I budget for with AI search monitoring?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Hidden costs include the delay cost of months where nothing changes, prompt caps pushing you into a higher tier, extra charges for a second domain, seat or country, the risk of a spreadsheet owner leaving with the routine, and unread reporting that costs $1,200 a year at a $100 hourly value without changing a page. Three months of a $59 tracker is $177 in fees that bought observation, not execution, if nobody acts on it."}}]}]}
```